- OKX’s CEO criticized Zhao Changpeng, saying his declare of “cash freedom” was deceptive.
- Mr. Zhao’s memoir has acquired widespread consideration throughout the cryptocurrency sector.
- New questions have arisen about whether or not CZ’s marital standing and private info disclosures are constant.
A brand new controversy is brewing within the crypto world after the founder and CEO of OKX publicly criticized Binance founder Qiao Changpeng, accusing him of spreading deceptive claims in his newly revealed e book Freedom of Cash.
OKX bosses mentioned in a press release that whereas they don’t intend to revisit previous disagreements, they felt compelled to reply because of the allegedly inaccurate allegations.
“I’ve little interest in revisiting these previous conflicts,” he mentioned. “However his e book is stuffed with lies and he dragged me into this drawback for no purpose.”
Issues about public statements
The OKX founder additionally claimed that Mr. Zhao has a sample of creating doubtlessly deceptive statements. “He has a long-standing behavior of creating deceptive statements to the general public, the media and the world,” he mentioned.
The remarks got here as Zhao’s e book has been making headlines throughout the crypto sector. The handwritten and self-published 457-page memoir focuses on his journey from the hardships of his childhood life to constructing Binance into a world trade. Proceeds from the e book will reportedly be donated to charity.
Questions relating to disclosure of private info
The criticism additionally touched on Mr. Zhao’s private life, particularly his marital standing. In line with reviews, Mr. Zhao’s spouse submitted a letter of assist to the courtroom, referring to them as “husband” and “spouse.” Nonetheless, Mr. Zhao has often portrayed their relationship in a different way in public, together with hinting at separation or divorce.
OKX founders questioned the dearth of readability. “What’s the precise scenario?” He additionally requested whether or not correct authorized procedures had been adopted within the occasion of a divorce, significantly relating to the division of property.
He additionally questioned whether or not Chao’s monetary pursuits, together with Binance inventory, can be correctly handled if a divorce had been to happen, including that it raises considerations about legal responsibility and integrity past mere authorized issues.
Associated: OKCoin suspicions resurface as a result of Binance workers retirement report
Disclaimer: The knowledge contained on this article is for informational and academic functions solely. This text doesn’t represent monetary recommendation or recommendation of any sort. Coin Version isn’t answerable for any losses incurred on account of the usage of the content material, merchandise, or companies talked about. We encourage our readers to do their due diligence earlier than taking any motion associated to our firm.